<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good example of why anti-gouging laws are a bad idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joewhite.com/2007/01/09/good-example-of-why-anti-gouging-laws-are-a-bad-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joewhite.com/2007/01/09/good-example-of-why-anti-gouging-laws-are-a-bad-idea/</link>
	<description>The occasional writings of a questionable mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 01:45:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.joewhite.com/2007/01/09/good-example-of-why-anti-gouging-laws-are-a-bad-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joewhite.com/2007/01/09/good-example-of-why-anti-gouging-laws-are-a-bad-idea/#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>Almost anything can be taken to the point of ridiculousness. Anti-gouging laws can be good. They can also be stupid.

The notion that a 5% rule-of-thumb is the Final Authority over and against actual costs of transportation and time being rolled in is where the stupidity comes in.

For a regular business, selling its already-held stock of plywood in advance of a hurricane, the 5% rule might make sense. For people trucking in emergency supplies, no. You pay extra for extraordinary service. That&#039;s not gouging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost anything can be taken to the point of ridiculousness. Anti-gouging laws can be good. They can also be stupid.</p>
<p>The notion that a 5% rule-of-thumb is the Final Authority over and against actual costs of transportation and time being rolled in is where the stupidity comes in.</p>
<p>For a regular business, selling its already-held stock of plywood in advance of a hurricane, the 5% rule might make sense. For people trucking in emergency supplies, no. You pay extra for extraordinary service. That&#8217;s not gouging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
